Technical documentation of the print through direct material observation, including paper structure (laid pattern and chain lines), ink–fiber interaction, plate mark under raking light, line morphology under macro/microscopy, and tonal mechanism analysis (dense hatching, selective burr). Comparative overlay.
Technical documentation of the print through direct material observation, including paper structure (laid pattern and chain lines), ink–fiber interaction, plate mark under raking light, line morphology under macro/microscopy, and tonal mechanism analysis (dense hatching, selective burr). Comparative overlay.
The print is executed on a laid rag paper produced by hand mould. Under transmitted light and microscopic examination, the characteristic structure of laid paper is clearly visible, with a regular system of fine laid lines and a secondary system of more widely spaced chain lines.
The sheet is notably thick and rigid in handling, closer in body to light card stock than to a thin printing paper. With a total sheet weight of approximately 15 grams and dimensions of 32 × 24.5 cm, the calculated paper density is approximately 190 g/m², placing it in the upper range of early modern handmade rag papers used for intaglio printing.
This substantial thickness and mass are consistent with high-quality rag paper intended to withstand the pressure of the intaglio press, allowing deep penetration of ink into the fiber network without surface disruption. The physical stiffness, fiber cohesion, and resistance of the sheet are fully coherent with historical hand-moulded laid paper and incompatible with lightweight or industrially produced supports.
Measurement of the chain lines reveals two recurring spacings:
This variation is fully consistent with handmade laid paper, where slight shifts in mould tension and positioning produce non-uniform but structurally coherent spacing.
Such values fall squarely within the expected range for early modern European rag papers used for intaglio printing.
Microscopic images of the paper surface reveal:
The surface texture shows:
This is the behavior of a true historical rag paper.
Microscopic examination shows that the ink does not sit on the surface as a flat or continuous layer. Instead:
This penetration pattern is characteristic of intaglio printing under pressure.
Under ultraviolet illumination, the paper shows:
The inked areas behave differently from the bare paper, confirming that the ink is physically embedded within the paper structure rather than forming a superficial film.
The combined evidence of laid paper structure, chain line spacing at 25 mm and 27 mm, rag fiber morphology, ink penetration into the fiber network, and natural ultraviolet response demonstrates that the support is a genuine handmade laid rag paper consistent with early intaglio printing.
In Apollo and Diana the image is not built from tonal masses or flat areas, but through the systematic accumulation of extremely fine lines incised into the plate. The modeling of forms, spatial depth, and tonal transitions is achieved exclusively through variations in density, orientation, and superposition of fields of micro-lines.
There is no true “continuous tone” anywhere in the print: every shadow, volume, or gradation is an optical result of the concentration or dispersion of individual strokes. On a material level, each of these lines corresponds to a physical groove incised into the metal and transferred to the paper under pressure.
This system of construction by line fields is characteristic of high-precision burin engraving and demonstrates an extreme level of control over both tool and support, reaching line resolutions on the order of a few hundredths of a millimeter.
The following six macros document the fundamental constructive principle of the image: form, volume, depth, and light are not produced by tonal washes, continuous surfaces, or masses of ink, but exclusively through organized systems of incised micro-lines.
Every visible element—faces, bodies, hair, animals, background, and transitions between planes—is built through the orientation, curvature, superposition, and progressive densification of individual strokes physically engraved into the plate. Each line corresponds to a real groove holding ink in relief.
These images demonstrate that the work operates as a fully linear, fully intaglio system: light, shadow, and volume emerge solely from the architecture of lines, not from tone. The six macros below analyze this principle across different zones of the composition: facial definition, radiant background, anatomical modeling, hair and animal forms, plane transitions, and crossing line fields.
Measurement, density, and modulation of the engraved stroke. This subsection focuses on the stroke itself as the fundamental constructive unit of the image. While the previous macros demonstrated how entire forms and fields are built through micro-lines, the following figures document the internal mechanics of that system: line density per millimeter, transitions between planes, the superposition of different drawing logics, and the generation of darker values through pure line compression. These images show that each visible mark is an independent physical groove engraved into the plate and filled with ink, and that all tonal, spatial, and volumetric effects emerge exclusively from the organization, spacing, and density of lines—without any use of tonal masses, continuous surfaces, or mechanical screening.
Microscopic structure of the printed line — physical evidence of intaglio printing: ink embedded in fibers, continuous grooves, and capillary diffusion in rag paper. The following microscopic images examine the print at the level where the physical nature of the process becomes unmistakable. At this scale, the image is no longer a “drawing” or a “reproduction,” but a material object composed of paper fibers, ink, and pressure.
Across all examples, the same fundamental phenomena are observed: the ink is not resting on the surface, but is embedded between and around the paper fibers, following the microscopic relief left by the metal plate. Each black line corresponds to a real physical groove cut into the plate, now visible as a continuous channel filled with ink and partially surrounded by fibers compressed during printing.
In many areas, a slight capillary diffusion of the ink into the rag paper can be seen, producing soft, organic micro-spreading at the edges of the lines. This is a natural consequence of dampened handmade paper under pressure and is incompatible with any photomechanical or surface-based printing process.
The microscope thus confirms, at the material level, what is already evident in the macros: this is not a heliogravure, not a photogravure, not a facsimile, and not a surface print, but a genuine, mechanically printed intaglio impression from an engraved plate.
The following comparative overlays confront the Álvarez Collection impression with two independent institutional reference impressions preserved at the Louvre and the British Museum.
These comparisons are not based on visual resemblance or stylistic judgment, but on strict geometric and structural coincidence: the full architecture of the engraved composition — including figure proportions, line trajectories, curvature of the bow, radiation field, ground construction, and secondary elements — aligns with no measurable deviation beyond minor paper deformation and printing variability.
Such a degree of correspondence is only possible when the impressions originate from the same engraved copper plate. No copy, reinterpretation, or photomechanical process can reproduce this level of point-to-point structural identity across the entire image.
The overlays therefore demonstrate, in purely material and geometric terms, that the Álvarez Collection impression belongs to the same physical matrix as the institutional impressions. This establishes plate identity independently of provenance narratives, stylistic attribution, or catalog traditions.
What is shown here is not an argument of authority, but a direct material proof of shared origin.
The print was transmitted from generation to generation, remaining within the same family. Its state of preservation suggests minimal historical handling: it was stored for decades in a protected environment, away from direct light and damaging humidity fluctuations. It is likely that the print has been handled far less during the past one hundred years than during the recent technical examination conducted under microscopy, raking light, and transmitted-light watermark analysis.
This continuity of private custody—without recorded sales, auction appearances, or dealer interventions—helps explain the exceptional condition of the sheet and the survival of fragile physical features often lost in circulating impressions, including residual micro-relief, intact margins, and a fully preserved plate impression.
Provenance therefore supports attribution not only through lineage, but through material coherence: every aspect of the sheet’s condition aligns with an impression that has remained intact and undisturbed over time.
High-resolution files, complete sets of macrophotographs, and the internal technical dossier of Álvarez's print of Apollo and Diana are available to researchers upon request. Comparative video microscopy sessions can also be arranged for institutions interested in examining in detail the physical characteristics associated with early stages of the plate's use, in support of scholarly evaluation and curatorial review.
All observations presented on this page are based on direct examination of the private print and published images from institutional collections. Attribution, dating, and official terminology are subject to scholarly debate and are offered here as a contribution to ongoing research on the engravings of Jacopo de’ Barbari (c. 1460/70 – before 1516).
For inquiries, image permissions, or collaborative research projects, please use the contact form on the main website or write to:
susana123.sd@gmail.com
fineartoldmasters9919@gmail.com
susana@alvarezart.info
Phone: +1 786 554 2925 / +1 305 690 2148
Álvarez Collection Verification Record #AC-JB-244-REV-2026