Technical documentation of the print through direct material observation, including paper structure (laid pattern and chain lines), ink–fiber interaction, plate mark under raking light, line morphology under macro/microscopy, and tonal mechanism analysis (dense hatching, selective burr). Comparative overlay.
Technical documentation of the print through direct material observation, including paper structure (laid pattern and chain lines), ink–fiber interaction, plate mark under raking light, line morphology under macro/microscopy, and tonal mechanism analysis (dense hatching, selective burr). Comparative overlay.
The print is executed on a laid paper produced using a hand mould, characterized by a regular system of fine laid lines intersected by a secondary system of more widely spaced chain lines. Under transmitted and raking light, the structural formation of the sheet is clearly visible, confirming its handmade origin.
The support presents a cohesive and dense fibrous network consistent with rag-based papermaking. Microscopic observation reveals natural irregularities in fiber distribution, including occasional inclusions and variations in fiber orientation typical of historical handmade paper. The fiber network shows stable structural integrity across the sheet and responds coherently to printing pressure.
Measurement of the chain line spacing reveals a recurring pattern ranging between approximately 28 mm and 29 mm, recorded across multiple observation points on the sheet. This spacing falls within the range commonly associated with high-quality laid papers historically used for intaglio printing.
The regularity of the chain line intervals indicates a stable mould construction and consistent papermaking process. The spacing pattern remains coherent across the sheet, supporting the conclusion that the paper was produced using a traditional laid mould rather than later industrial paper supports.
The sheet contains a clearly legible watermark representing a Fortuna-type motif, preserved with strong structural clarity. The watermark is formed by the impression of wire elements integrated into the papermaking mould, and its lines remain continuous and consistent in thickness, curvature, and structural articulation throughout the design.
The watermark is materially and structurally coherent with the surrounding paper formation, showing no evidence of later insertion, artificial modification, or secondary manipulation. Its integration within the laid and chain line system confirms its formation as an inherent component of the papermaking process rather than a later addition.
Fortuna-type watermark motifs are documented within established typological families recorded in classical watermark catalogues such as Briquet, including related variants catalogued under numbers 11909–11911, and are further represented in modern watermark databases including the Bernstein Memory of Paper project. These references demonstrate the recurrence of Fortuna-type designs across multiple geographic papermaking centres and chronological contexts within early modern European paper production.
Because such watermark motifs are known to circulate across extended production periods and between papermaking workshops, the watermark is evaluated within a broader morphological and structural tradition rather than as an isolated chronological indicator. Its significance is therefore considered in conjunction with the overall material characteristics of the sheet, including fibred structure, mould construction, chain line system, and printing response, all of which demonstrate coherent compatibility with handmade laid paper supports historically used for intaglio printing.
The plate mark is clearly defined and structurally integrated into the sheet, reflecting the mechanical interaction between the paper, the engraved plate and the printing press. Microscopic observation shows visible compression of the fiber network within the printed area, where the sheet exhibits increased fiber density and reduced surface irregularity.
Outside the plate mark, the fiber structure maintains its natural expansion and textural openness, allowing direct comparison between compressed and non-compressed paper zones. This transition demonstrates the physical response of the support to the pressure of the intaglio printing process.
The engraved lines interact directly with the compressed fiber network, confirming the mechanical relationship between incisions, ink transfer and paper deformation during printing.
Microscopic examination reveals a network of interlaced rag fibers with natural variability in thickness, direction and density. Occasional isolated fibers and minor inclusions are visible within the sheet and remain consistent with handmade rag paper supports. No uniform coatings, artificial surface films or homogeneous layers associated with industrial or photomechanical paper treatments are observed. The surface structure remains organically irregular and materially coherent with traditional handmade paper formation.
Observation at high magnification demonstrates that the printing ink is primarily retained within the engraved grooves and interacts directly with the compressed fiber network surrounding the incisions. Ink distribution varies naturally along the course of individual strokes, reflecting differences in pressure, engraving depth and wiping technique during printing. This interaction confirms the physical transfer of ink through the intaglio process and supports the structural integration between engraving, ink and support.
Examination under ultraviolet illumination (365 nm) was performed to evaluate the fluorescence behavior of the paper support, the ink, and the relationship between printed and unprinted areas. Under UV-A illumination, the paper exhibits a generally soft and homogeneous fluorescence, consistent with natural ageing of historical rag paper fibers. No areas of strong localized fluorescence were observed, and no evidence of modern optical brighteners, synthetic coatings, or restoration materials is visually detected.
The printed image remains comparatively darker under UV illumination, indicating the absorptive behaviour of the printing ink and its integration within the intaglio grooves. The fluorescence pattern remains stable across printed and non-printed zones, suggesting structural coherence between ink deposition and the paper matrix. The plate mark remains clearly visible under ultraviolet illumination, showing differential compression of the fibers inside and outside the plate impression, consistent with mechanical pressure generated during the intaglio printing process.
Additional transmitted ultraviolet observations at higher magnification reveal internal variations in fiber density and distribution. The fluorescence response shows irregular clustering and stratified fiber groupings characteristic of hand-formed rag paper. These variations correspond to differences in fiber orientation, thickness, and bonding density generated during manual sheet formation. Linear fluorescence modulations are visible in repeating intervals, corresponding to the structural influence of the papermaking mould and its wire support system. These patterns reflect differential fiber accumulation rather than the direct visualization of mould wires, and they remain consistent with the expected formation structure of laid handmade paper. Localized non-fluorescent linear zones correspond to ink-filled intaglio grooves, where the printing ink absorbs ultraviolet radiation and appears optically dense. The continuity of these darker zones along engraved lines supports deep ink penetration into the fiber network, consistent with traditional intaglio printing behaviour.
Overall, the ultraviolet examination confirms the material consistency between paper formation, ink behaviour, and printing structure, and reveals no visually detectable interventions, modern additives, or surface alterations under 365 nm UV illumination.
The eight macro images presented in this section do not function as isolated examples, but rather as a progressive exploration of the work's complete technical system. Each detail has been selected to demonstrate how the image is constructed solely from the physical behavior of the engraved stroke, regardless of the subject matter, scale, or distance within the composition.
The macro analysis reveals that the print is governed by a unique and coherent logic of the burin, applied consistently from the main elements to the most peripheral ones. No technical breaks, procedural changes, or compensatory solutions are observed between different areas; on the contrary, the same structural language adapts to metallic surfaces, organic forms, distant architecture, and open tonal fields.
The images allow us to follow the continuous control of the gesture: the way in which the strokes begin, develop, and end responds to conscious decisions regarding pressure, direction, and rhythm. This control does not depend on the density of the grid or cumulative effects, but rather on the individual precision of each line, even when these operate at extreme registers—from heavy, deep lines to ultra-fine strokes almost suspended above the paper.
Likewise, the macro analysis reveals that volume, depth, and spatial separation are constructed without resorting to closed contours or fills, but rather through the modulation of the stroke in direct relation to the support. The paper remains active at all times, visible between lines and participating in the tonal reading, which reinforces the material understanding of the image as the result of excavated grooves rather than covered surfaces.
Taken together, these eight images demonstrate that the work is not organized by local effects or partial solutions, but by a comprehensive technical system, sustained from beginning to end. Macrophotography thus allows us to read the print not as a sum of motifs, but as a continuous structure of physical decisions, where each line—regardless of its narrative or visual function—responds to the same degree of control and technical coherence.
The microscopic section shifts the observation to the physical level of the groove and the contact between ink and support, allowing for direct examination of the material consequences of the engraving and printing process. Unlike macrographic analysis, which describes the visible organization of the line on the surface, microscopy focuses on the internal structure of the cut and the three-dimensional interaction between metal, ink, and paper fibers.
At this magnification level, the line ceases to be perceived as a graphic element and appears as an excavated three-dimensional structure, in which the groove walls, the bottom of the cut, and differentially distributed ink deposits can be distinguished. Microscopy allows us to observe how the ink concentrates on the edges of the groove, how its concentration varies within a single stroke, and how the paper fibers exhibit compression, displacement, and local adaptation under the pressure of printing.
Microscopic analysis does not address the composition or visual organization of the image, but rather documents the material response of the support and the ink to the printing technique. In this way, microscopy provides an independent and complementary interpretation, connecting the physical structure of the groove and the paper with the visible result of the print, and completing the technical study from a strictly material perspective.
Methodological Note: The microscopic images are used exclusively for descriptive and structural purposes. No interpretive filters or digital reconstructions are applied; the interpretation is based on direct observation of the groove, the ink, and the support.
The concluding microscopic images demonstrate the continuity of the engraving language across the composition, revealing the consistent relationship between incision, ink retention, and fiber deformation in both highly modeled passages and structurally transitional areas of the sheet.
Digital overlay analysis was conducted as a comparative tool to evaluate the structural correspondence between the present impression and an institutional reference impression documented in a museum collection. The purpose of this analysis is not to establish identical printing conditions, chronology, or edition sequence, but to assess whether both impressions are materially compatible with the same engraved matrix or with a coherent physical lineage derived from that matrix.
The overlays were executed using high-resolution digital images, aligned manually through stable structural anchors inherent to the engraving itself. These anchors include fixed compositional elements such as architectural contours, primary figure outlines, and internally consistent line junctions. No geometric distortion, rescaling, or corrective transformation was applied beyond uniform alignment.
A full-plate overlay was performed to evaluate the global structural correspondence of the composition. This comparison demonstrates consistent proportional relationships across the entire engraved field, including figure placement, architectural elements, and landscape contours. The alignment supports the conclusion that both impressions originate from an identical engraved design structure.
A partial overlay focused on the upper half of the plate was carried out to reduce cumulative alignment noise and to test structural coherence within a confined zone. This regional comparison confirms the continuity of engraved forms, spatial relationships, and line trajectories at a sub-plate level, reinforcing the compatibility observed in the full-plate overlay.
A localized overlay was executed concentrating on the horse’s head and the adjacent figure of Death. This zone was selected due to its high density of complex organic line work, curved hatching, and expressive burin strokes. Within this area, the overlay reveals close correspondence in line curvature, spacing, directional rhythm, and the interaction between primary and secondary engraved lines.
This localized comparison does not assert identical impressions or identical printing moments. Rather, it demonstrates that the engraver’s original linear language—its structural logic and internal coherence—is preserved across both impressions, consistent with production from the same engraved matrix or from impressions deriving directly from it.
Digital overlay analysis is employed here as a structural and morphological comparison tool only. It is not used to infer exact chronology, print order, or edition size. Variations in ink density, pressure, paper response, and surface condition are expected between impressions printed at different moments, even when pulled from the same plate.
Accordingly, the overlay results are interpreted in conjunction with independent technical evidence, including macrographic and microscopic line analysis, paper structure, watermark integration, plate mark characteristics, and ultraviolet examination. The convergence of these independent lines of evidence strengthens the interpretation of material coherence between the impressions.
The digital overlay analysis demonstrates a high degree of structural and morphological compatibility between the present impression and the institutional reference. When evaluated within the broader technical context, the overlays support the conclusion that the impressions belong to the same physical lineage of an engraved matrix and are inconsistent with photomechanical reproduction processes. The overlay evidence is therefore considered confirmatory rather than determinative, contributing to a multi-layered technical assessment grounded in material observation.
The print was transmitted from generation to generation, remaining within the same family. Its state of preservation suggests minimal historical handling: it was stored for decades in a protected environment, away from direct light and damaging humidity fluctuations. It is likely that the print has been handled far less during the past one hundred years than during the recent technical examination conducted under microscopy, raking light, and transmitted-light watermark analysis.
This continuity of private custody—without recorded sales, auction appearances, or dealer interventions—helps explain the exceptional condition of the sheet and the survival of fragile physical features often lost in circulating impressions, including residual micro-relief, intact margins, and a fully preserved plate impression.
Provenance therefore supports attribution not only through lineage, but through material coherence: every aspect of the sheet’s condition aligns with an impression that has remained intact and undisturbed over time.
High-resolution files, complete sets of macro photographs, and the internal technical dossier of Álvarez's print of Knight, Death and the Devil are available to researchers upon request. Comparative video microscopy sessions can also be arranged for institutions interested in examining in detail the physical characteristics associated with early stages of the plate's use, in support of scholarly evaluation and curatorial review.
All observations presented on this page are based on direct examination of the private print and published images from institutional collections. Attribution, dating, and official terminology are subject to scholarly debate and are offered here as a contribution to ongoing research on the engravings of Albrecht Dürer (c. 1471–1528).
For inquiries, image permissions, or collaborative research projects, please use the contact form on the main website or write to:
susana123.sd@gmail.com
fineartoldmasters9919@gmail.com
susana@alvarezart.info
Phone: +1 786 554 2925 / +1 305 690 2148
Álvarez Collection Verification Record #AC-AD-246-REV-2026